Legal Opinion

The Maurice R.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 21, 1932No. 12946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a suit for alleged cargo damage.

I find the facts as follows:

At all the times hereinafter mentioned and at the time of the trial, the libelant was *87a domestic corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue of tbe laws of tbe state of New York.

At all the times hereinafter mentioned, the libelant was the owner of a cargo consisting of 881 gross tons of bituminous coal, laden on board the barge Maurice R.

The barge Maurice R. was during the currency of process within this district and within the jurisdiction of this court.

At all the times hereinafter…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Sturgis v. BoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. EJ DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  4. Dailey v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  5. J. Aron & Co. v. DannebrogCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daly v. Seaboard Coal Dock Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1947
  2. The Dutton No. 6District Court, E.D. New York · 1934
  3. United States v. Wood Towing Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API