Legal Opinion
The Dutton No. 6
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 19, 1934No. Nos. 13964, 13960PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
The above entitled actions were on stipulation tried together, and as the facts are substantially the same in both eases, one opinion will be sufficient.'
The first above entitled action is brought by A. C. Dutton Lumber Corporation, the owner of the lighter Dutton No. 6, to recover for damages alleged to have been caused to said lighter by negligent towage by the ..tug Dauntless No. 7, and for breach of contract of towage.
The second above entitled action • is brought by Standard Marine Insurance Company, Limited, who are subrogated to the rights of A. C. Dutton Lumber…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The J. P. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The L. P. DaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- The RadnorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
- Delaware Dredging Co. v. GrahamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- A. S. Wikstrom, Inc. v. the Tug Julia C. MoranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- American Bridge Division, United States Steel Corp. v. Roen Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1963
- The MarinerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940
- Shamrock Towing Co. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940