Legal Opinion

Penifold v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 8, 1982No. WCB No. 78-9826, CA A23514PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the referee’s denial of her occupational disease claim. In an earlier decision in this case, we remanded it to the referee for reconsideration in light of claimant’s additional medical evidence. Penifold v. SAIF, 49 Or App 1015, 621 P2d 646 (1980). In the proceedings leading to that decision, the referee had found claimant’s contact dermatitis to be compensable. The Board had reversed, finding that her condition resulted from exposure to substances encountered off the job. On remand, the referee determined that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Frasure v. Agripac, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Penifold v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Saxton v. Lamb-WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reining v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Palmer v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API