Jack McCabe v. City of Eureka, Missouri

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal raises the single issue of whether an implied private right of action exists under 15 U.S.C. § 1674(a) of the Consumer Credit Protection Act. Jack McCabe appeals the dismissal of his complaint following the district court’s findings that no implied private right of action exists, 500 F.Supp. 59.

The pertinent statutory provisions provide:

§ 1674. Restriction on discharge from employment by reason of garnishment.(a) No employer may discharge any employee by reason of the fact that his earnings have been subjected to garnishment for any one indebtedness.(b) Whoever…