Burris v. Mahaney
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MORTON, Senior District Judge.
Ostensibly an attempt to vindicate constitutional rights through 42 U.S.C. § 1983, this matter constitutes little more than a fight for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The court does not intend to disparage the serious nature of financial hardship, but the entire cause of action arises out of a comedy of errors. The comedy of errors in turn results from a simple, blissful ignorance which now appears less than blissful, since the plaintiff charges that the errors reached constitutional proportions. Specifically, the plaintiff claims that the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re O'NeilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Johnson v. Town of Trail CreekDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
- Edward N. Carlton v. Ronald HerschelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Jones v. State of TennesseeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022
- REID v. BROWNDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021