Legal Opinion

Miller v. Lovell

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1994No. 93-1305Published

1Opinion of the Court

14 F.3d 20

Tom MILLER, Appellant,

v.

Jean LOVELL; Mark Martin; E. Benjamin Nelson; Donald

Stenberg; Ronald H. Tussing; Harold W. Clarke; Phyllis

Anstine; Jack D. Campbell; Tim Dempsey; Pitmon Foxall,

Sr.; Martin Gutschenritter; Darrell Johnson; Gary E.

Lacey; David J. Lanphier; Kathy Moore; John P. Murphy;

Vernon H. Pearson; James L. Riskowski; William G. White, Appellees.

No. 93-1305.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 12, 1993.

Decided Jan. 7, 1994.

Sharon M. Lindgren, Lincoln, NE, argued, for appellant.

James C. Zalewski, Lincoln, NE, argued, for all appellees.

Thomas O.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. John Brown v. Steve BrienenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Yolanda Fuentes Riggins v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, a Public Body Corporate John Dzerk, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. Maples v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API