Legal Opinion

Union Transfer Co. v. Renstrom

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1949No. 32574PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff, a duly authorized motor vehicle common carrier engaged in interstate commerce, brought this action to recover the difference between its duly approved,-filed, and published applicable tariff rate and the rate paid by defendants, based upon alleged false descriptions in bills of lading furnished plaintiff by defendants for shipments of steel stampings loose in barrels and transported by plaintiff upon designated occasions from Omaha to St. Paul, Minnesota, and return. The items were concededly described and transported as “unfinished stampings” and if such, concededly carried a rate…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. American Ry. Express Co. v. Price Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  3. Hardaway v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  4. Pennsylvania R. v. Fox & London, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  5. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. BundickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953
  2. Hughes Transp., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  3. Humphrey Feed & Grain, Inc. v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bolin Drive-A-Way Co., a Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  5. Minton v. General Shale Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API