Heyworth v. Industrial Commission
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan
A writ of error was allowed to Heyworth by this court for a review of the record.
The record discloses the following facts: Martin Lee-son, also referred to in the record as Martin Gleason, was and had been employed by James O. Heyworth for about three years previous to his death. His duties were that of “handy man” for Heyworth, who was engaged in the business of construction and engineering work. On June 9, 1922, Heyworth shipped from Chicago to Jim Falls, Wisconsin, a locomotive crane, to be used in construction and engineering work, and the deceased was employed to get in touch with the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vulcan Detinning Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Jefferson Printing Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- Yellow Cab Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carson-Payson Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Ralph H. Simpson Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Crow's Hybrid Corn Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- County of Cook v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
- Crouch-Walker Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.