Legal Opinion

Mowery v. Crittenton Hospital

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 1986No. Docket 85049PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

On June 27 and August 6, 1985, the circuit court for Oakland County, pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1) and (3), entered orders of summary judgment in favor of defendants Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., and American Home Products, Inc., as to the issues of defendants’ failure to test their drug product, Phospholine Iodide, and failure to warn plaintiffs of its dangers. Plaintiffs appeal as of right raising two issues: (1) whether a drug manufacturer has the duty to warn the ultimate consumer of the product’s dangers; and (2) whether the trial court erred in finding that defendants’ alleged failure to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Smith v. E R Squibb & Sons, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Dunn v. Lederle LaboratoriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Dunkin v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
  2. Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
  3. Spychala v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
  4. Brown v. Drake-Willock International, LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API