Legal Opinion

Ross v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1958No. 40941PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

Appellant, Andy Ross, was indicated for and convicted of manslaughter, in the Circuit Court of Monroe County. He contends he was entitled to a peremptory instruction. Appellant asked for a directed verdict after the State had closed its case. It was denied, and he then introduced two witnesses. After that he did not ask for a peremptory instruction. It is well settled that a defendant waives his motion for a- directed verdict made after the State’s case, where he then introduces evidence in his behalf. Kearney v. State, 224 Miss. 1, 79 So. 2d 468 (1955); I. C. R. R. Co. v. Perkins, 223 Miss.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weathersby v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Bowen v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Illinois Central RR Co. v. PerkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Lee v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Kearney v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Robinson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Joseph Wakaksan, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  4. Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Griffin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API