Legal Opinion

Murphy v. the Anaconda Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1958No. 9808PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE BOTTOMLY:

This is an appeal by The Anaconda Company, a corporation, from a judgment against it and in favor of the claimant, Mary Murphy, in an action brought by her under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

The claim for compensation was filed by Mary Murphy, the widow of one Dan Murphy, to recover compensation benefits alleged to be owing her by reason of the death of her said husband from an industrial accident. The widow’s claim was denied by The Anaconda Company and a hearing was then had thereon before the Industrial Accident Board.

On May 21, 1956, the widow’s claim for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Dosen v. East Butte Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Moffett v. Bozeman Canning Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Nicholson v. Roundup Coal Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Bryant Stave & Heading Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Allen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Birnie v. UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Erhart v. Great Western Sugar CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Jensen v. Zook Bros. Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Lupien v. Montana Record Publishing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API