Legal Opinion

Freedman v. Statewide Machinery, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtG. Robert Witmer, J.

Pursuant to rule 9-a of the Rules of Civil Practice the defendant Statewide Machinery, Inc. served notice through its attorneys herein upon the attorney for the plaintiff, demanding a verified statement setting for the post-office address and residence of the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s attorney submitted a letter for the plaintiff in response to the demand, stating that the plaintiff’s address is as indicated in the pleadings and that the plaintiff was out of the State at the time. Thereupon the defendant moved to stay the plaintiff from proceeding with this action until he should comply with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fischer v. Seamen's Church InstituteNew York Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Kesten & CooperNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Nicholson v. 300 Broadway Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. New Jersey Shale Brick & Tile Sales Corp. v. Queensland Realty Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API