Legal Opinion

Ohio Finance Co. v. Berry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1941No. 27,633PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShake, J.

The appellees were plaintiffs below and their complaint was in three paragraphs. The first paragraph sought damages for trespass to personal property; the second charged conversion of said property ; and the third was for malicious prosecution of an action brought by the appellant to replevin said property.

There was an amended plea in abatement to the complaint as a whole, to which the trial court sustained a demurrer for want of facts. This ruling is assigned as error. The amended plea alleged merely that prior to the commencement of the present action the appellant filed a complaint in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aufderheide v. FulkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Ault v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. McCullomIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Richardson v. BrewerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Union Traction Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. TackettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Old Town Development Company v. LangfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Van Bibber v. NorrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Turner v. Sheriff of Marion CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
  5. Clarke Auto Co. v. ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API