Ohio Finance Co. v. Berry
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShake, J.
The appellees were plaintiffs below and their complaint was in three paragraphs. The first paragraph sought damages for trespass to personal property; the second charged conversion of said property ; and the third was for malicious prosecution of an action brought by the appellant to replevin said property.
There was an amended plea in abatement to the complaint as a whole, to which the trial court sustained a demurrer for want of facts. This ruling is assigned as error. The amended plea alleged merely that prior to the commencement of the present action the appellant filed a complaint in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aufderheide v. FulkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Ault v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. McCullomIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
- Richardson v. BrewerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Union Traction Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. TackettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Old Town Development Company v. LangfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Van Bibber v. NorrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Turner v. Sheriff of Marion CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
- Clarke Auto Co. v. ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.