Sinclair Refining Co. v. McCullom
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLaymon, J.
Appellee James MeCullom sought by this action to recover damages alleged to have been occasioned by the acts and conduct of appellee George Zorich and appellant, Sinclair Refining Company.
The complaint was in one paragraph and, omitting the formal parts, is as follows:
‘ ‘ That heretofore, and on the 28th day of July, 1936, the defendant, George Zorich, caused to be filed in the Clerk’s Office of the Lake Superior Court, sitting at Hammond, Indiana, his certain complaint against this plaintiff under Cause No. 47012 of said court, and wher-ein, the defendant, Sinclair Refining Company, a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Express Co. v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Moore v. CroseIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ShanksIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Executive Estates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Montgomery Ward Co., Inc. v. GuignetIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Hibschman Pontiac, Inc. v. BatchelorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Miller Pipeline Corp. v. BroekerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Jeffersonville Silgas, Inc. v. WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.