Legal Opinion
Meslat v. Amster-Kirtz Co., 2007 Ca 00189 (8-11-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 11, 2008No. Nos. 2007 CA 00189 and 2007 CA 00190PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants Mohammad Meslat, dba Lakeshore Farm Market, Alhasake, Inc. dba Midtown Market and Mario Meslat appeal from the June 12, 2007, Judgment Entries issued by the Canton Municipal Court overruling their Motions to Vacate Judgment.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE
{¶ 2} On November 6, 2006, appellee Amster-Kirtz Company filed a complaint (Case No. 2006-CVF-8736) against appellants Alhasake, Inc. dba Midtown Market c/o Mohammad Meslat and Mario Meslat1 in the Canton Municipal Court. Appellee, in its complaint, alleged that such appellants had failed to pay it the sum…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Morrison v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Foreman v. Bellefontaine Municipal CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Soloman v. Excel Marketing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marsh-Monsanto v. St. Thomas-St. John Board of ElectionsSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Cintas Corp. 130 v. Artcraft Memorials Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011