Legal Opinion

Peaden v. Estes

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 1, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, J.:

We affirmed the decree here on appeal without opinion and have since granted a rehearing.

The controlling question is whether the holder of a tax deed in this case is entitled to the benefit of Section 196.06, Fla. Stat., 1941, F.S.A., which provides:

“When the holder of a tax deed goes into actual possession, occupancy and use of the land embraced in such tax deed, and so continues for a period of four years, no suit for the recovery of the possession thereof shall be brought by a former owner or other adverse claimant, unless such suit be commenced within, or prior to, the said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sanborn v. South Florida Naval Stores Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Palmquist v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API