Legal Opinion
United States v. Cederquist
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 16, 1981No. 80-1018PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
The district court dismissed the indictment against the defendants on the bases of prejudicial pre-indictment delay and prosecutorial misconduct before the grand jury. The government appeals those determinations. We now reverse.
I. FACTS
On December 28, 1978, a federal grand jury returned a fifteen-count indictment against four corporations — Hallcraft Homes, Inc., presently existing by reason of a merger as Nu-West Development Corporation of Arizona, Hallcraft Homes of Denver, Hallcraft Homes of San Diego, and Hallcraft Homes of Los Angeles (who will be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Ernest Raymond BasurtoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Herman ChanenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Averhart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Buzbee v. DonnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. Frank M. Long, Steak N' Lobster, Inc., Reagan Joe BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Mitcheal EdmonsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.