Legal Opinion

Darrell Edison v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided November 30, 2012No. 03-12-00724-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00724-CR Darrell Edison, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOS. D-1-DC-09-206713 & D-1-DC-10-907220, THE HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Darrell Edison has filed a pro se pleading entitled Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Looking to the substance of Edison’s pleading, rather than its title or form, we construe his motion as a notice of appeal, see Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. Abel,

997 S.W.2d 598, 601

(Tex. 1999)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Abbott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Olowosuko v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. AbelTexas Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API