Legal Opinion
Niedbala v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 22, 1996No. 95-734 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
This case stands on defendant’s motion filed February 5, 1996 to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We conclude that defendant’s motion must be granted.
I
Plaintiff and his wife are American citizens who reside on Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal. Plaintiff retired from the U.S. Air Force in 1962. The Lajes Field, Azores, U.S. Air Force base security police issued to plaintiff base license plates for two automobiles owned by him and operated in the Azores. It apparently was standard practice from 1987 through 1994 for the base…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Richard E. Collins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robert E. Moore, a Single Man v. The United Kingdom, a Foreign Government Kenneth Southall John Does, I-XCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Kennedy Heights Apartments, Ltd. I v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Murphy ex rel. Estate of Payne v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Duncan v. WestDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.