Spiselman v. Rabinowitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.
The second cause of action which has been dismissed as against defendants-respondents Anne Shemler, Florence Savlowitz, Bessie Rabinowitz and David Sheriben for legal insufficiency, may be summarized as follows:
On January 8, 1945, defendants Louis Rabinowitz and Sam Shemler, copartners trading under the name of Valjean Pearl Co., entered into a written agreement with plaintiff under which the latter disclosed to said defendants a secret forumla for “ pearlizing ” glass beads for a specified remuneration. The contract provided that the parties thereto would not disclose the secret formula to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Uline v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Galway v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Peabody v. NorfolkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Dior v. MiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Standard Brands, Inc. v. ZumpeDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Technical Tape Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- DC Comics, Inc. v. Filmation AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.