Legal Opinion

Darrell W. Harris and Pamela Harris v. Fort Oglethorpe State Bank

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 28, 1983No. 82-5470PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The plan submitted by Darrell W. and Pamela Harris, pursuant to a petition filed under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act, provided for full payment of a promissory note due and owing to the Fort Oglethorpe State Bank (Bank). The note was secured and guaranteed by a co-signer, Joe Lewis Puryear. The automatic stay provisions contained in 11 U.S.C. § 1301 precluded the Bank from instituting collection proceedings against Puryear. On November 10, 1981, the Bank filed a “Request for Permission to Pursue Comaker” which was denied by the bankruptcy judge on January 7, 1982. On appeal to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
  2. Harris v. Fort Oglethorpe State BankDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of SommersdorfUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  2. In Re ButlerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1999
  3. First Franklin Financial Corp. v. Alls (In Re Alls)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1999
  4. In Re DeenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2000
  5. In Re HumphreyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API