United States v. Christy
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Circuit Judge.
Defendanb-Appellant Edward Christy appeals from an order of the district court granting in part the government’s motion to reconsider and denying Mr. Christy’s motion to suppress on the basis of the inevitable discovery doctrine. United States v. Christy, 810 F.Supp.2d 1219 (D.N.M.2011). The district court initially granted the motion to suppress. United States v. Christy, 785 F.Supp.2d 1004 (D.N.M.2011). 1 Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion to reconsider and correctly applied…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- United States v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. LoeraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Eaton v. PachecoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. AlabiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.