Walker-Hill Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
The trial court upheld plaintiff’s right to recover $7,495.80 from the Government, on distilled spirits used in 1943, as “drawbacks,” because the eggnog product it manufactured was a “food product” and not a “beverage,” under Section 3250, Internal Revenue Code, as amended by Section 602(f) of the Revenue Act of 1942. This Section provides: “Any person using distilled spirits produced in a domestic registered distillery or in industrial alcohol plant and fully tax-paid in the manufacture or production of medicines, medicinal preparations, food products, flavors, or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
3Cited by18 opinions
- Smale & Robinson, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Geer v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950
- Flamm v. RibicoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Loren S. Cheers v. Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare of the United States, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Chapman, Secretary of the Interior v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.