Legal Opinion

Woolman v. Capital National Bank

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of SedgwieJe County.

1Opinion of the CourtRichmond, P. J.

' This was an action upon a promissory note. On the 5th of August, 1889, The Capital National Bank filed its complaint in the county court of Sedgwick county, alleging that H. M. Woolman did on the 19th day of June, 1888, make and deliver to Stark & Mosher his certain promissory note in writing.

That for a valuable consideration Stark & Mosher indorsed said note, without recourse to the plaintiff.

That it is the rightful owner and holder of said note. And that there is due the plaintiff on said note the sum of 1435, with interest at ten per cent per annum from the 19th day of June, 1888. Prayer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burgwin v. BabcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Davidson v. RemingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Canfield v. ArnettColorado Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Canfield v. ArnettColorado Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API