Legal Opinion
Canfield v. Arnett
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 1902No. 2116PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from the County Court of Boulder County.
1Opinion of the CourtGunter, J.
Plaintiff sued upon this note:
“$355 25-100.. . Roulder, Colo., Aug. 4, 1898.
‘ ‘ One day after date-, we or .either promise to. pay *427to the order of Marg G. Arnett .Three Hundred Fifty-five and 25-100 dollars at Boulder, Golo. Value-received. Int. 10 per cent.-per annum. Frank Canfield, Nettie Canfield.”
As a .counterclaim Frank .Canfield set up an indebtedness, upon contract, due him from plaintiff. By demurrer the objection was made and sustained that plaintiff’s cause of action was joint; the cause of action stated in the counterclaim several; that such several cause of action did .not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thatcher v. RockwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
- Thalheimer v. CrowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Ingols v. PlimptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Woolman v. Capital National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richmond Ins. v. LitteerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924