Legal Opinion

Curtin v. Ingle

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1909No. Civ. No. 661Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Appeals from judgment in favor of defendant and order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff sought to recover for eleven thousand five hundred and nineteen grain bags, being a portion of fourteen thousand five hundred alleged to have been delivered by Moore, Ferguson & Co., the assignors of plaintiff, to defendant, to be filled with grain and shipped to Moore, Ferguson & Co., or accounted for, and if not accounted for to be paid for at seven cents each. It is 'alleged that eleven thousand five hundred and nineteen of the fourteen thousand five hundred bags were never accounted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Curtin v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Curtin v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API