Legal Opinion

Curtin v. Ingle

California Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1904No. S.F. No. 3591PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This action was brought to recover $806.33 for bags, $80,64 for twine delivered to defendant, and for $34.30 for money paid, and received by defendant. The trial was had without a jury, and the findings and judgment were for plaintiff for the several amounts claimed and interest. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying him a new trial.

The plaintiff sues as assignee of Moore, Ferguson & Co., a firm of grain dealers, doing business in San Francisco, which firm will be hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs. The defendant was a merchant doing business at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Curtin v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Curtin v. IngleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API