Legal Opinion

United States v. Abrams

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided February 23, 1916No. 291PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Criminal prosecution by the United States against Morris N. Abrams and another. Heard on the petition of defendants to require the district attorney to deliver certain papers to them filed December 13, 1915, and amended petition filed January 27, 1916, and cx parte affidavits filed December 6, 1915, and February 2 and 17, 1916.

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, District Judge.

[1] It fairly appears from the petitions and affidavits that Carl H. Chandler, a customs agent, and Jeremiah Dillon, a deputy collector, entered the defendants’ place of business at New Éondon, Conn., on or about the 24th of March, 1913, and informed the defendant Morris N. Abrams that they were such officers of the government; that Mr. Dillon then said to this defendant that it would be better for him if he gave Mr. Chandler what he wanted; that then Mr. Chandler, without any further conversation and without this defendant’s consent, took from the defendants’ desk a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. United States v. Wong Quong WongDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1899

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Ernest T. PageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. State v. OwensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  3. State v. McClurgIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Raymond A. Biggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  5. United States v. BaldocciDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API