Legal Opinion
Perkins v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 13, 1924No. 23,856PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover for injuries sustained by the plaintiff while in the employ of the defendant in interstate commerce. There was a *493verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.
The case was here on a former appeal after a verdict for the plaintiff. Perkins v. Great Northern By. Co. 152 Minn. 226, 188 N. W. 564. A reversal resulted. It was based on the submission as a ground of recovery of the plaintiff’s claim that a negligent jerking of the train was a cause of his falling; and upon the admission of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. OtosSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Clark v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Ahlberg v. GriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sullivan v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Jacobs v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Fink v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State v. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928