Legal Opinion
Brown v. Honiss
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 17, 1907PublishedCited by 13 opinions
On error to Esses Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pitney, J'.
This is an action upon contract, brought to recover damages for breach of a written agreement for conveyance of land. The agreement is of the form known as an “option,” and is in the following words:
“This is to certify that John Honiss and Anna P. Ranney, owners of the premises hereinafter described, in consideration. *503of the payment of twenty-five dollars, do hereby give and grant to William II. Brown, of 78 Eourth avenue, Newark, N. J., agent, the option to purchase the certain tract of land in said city of Newark, bounded by Mt. Prospect…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brennan v. United Hatters of North America, Local No. 17Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- Consolidated Traction Co. v. HoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
- Gerbert v. Trustees of the Congregation of the Sons of AbrahamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Brown v. HonnissSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
3Cited by13 opinions
- Communications Workers of America v. FlorioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Karcher v. KeanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Terrance J. Velten v. Regis B. Lippert, Intercat, Inc., Intercat Pacific, Inc., Formerly Intercat, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Prudential Insurance Co. v. LavalNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Kern v. KoganNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.