Kastner v. Pibilinski

Appellant’s complaint is based on a promissory note executed to Michael Badner by George Pibilinski and Peter Gooske, and, as the complaint alleges, assigned by Badner to Carl Goerg, and by him to the appellant. The makers of the note appeared and by answer admitted their liability on the note, and alleged that there was a dispute as to the ownership. Matilda Goerg filed a cross complaint, as*230serting that she was the owner of the note sued on, and alleging that Carl Goerg had obtained the assignment of the note to be made to him by false and fraudulent pretences. The contest is between the…