Legal Opinion

People v. Tuck

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Appellant’s contention is that his right to confrontation was violated by the trial court’s allowing an unsworn seven-year-old prosecution witness to sit at a table facing the jury, and turned away from appellant (see, Coy v Iowa, 487 US 1012). This was done because the witness’ testimony was not audible and the courtroom was not equipped with a sound amplification system.

Under the circumstances presented this was error. However, the conviction must still be affirmed. Examining the remaining evidence, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. People v. GarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. State v. EvansMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. CrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API