Legal Opinion
Wirtz v. Crystal Lake Crushed Stone Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 4, 1964No. Nos. 14232, 14233PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASTLE, Circuit Judge.
The Secretary of Labor brought these two actions1 in the District Court for injunctive relief under Section 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. In No. 14232 Crystal Lake Crushed Stone Company is charged with violating the Act’s overtime provisions with respect to employees engaged in the quarrying, processing and handling of sand and gravel on Crystal’s premises. In No. 14233 Wolf Trucking Service 2 is charged with violating both the overtime provisions and record-keeping requirements 3 with respect to employees engaged in the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walters v. American Coach Lines of Miami, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Nunn's Battery and Electric Company, Inc. v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Ray Smith Transport CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Crystal Lake Crushed Stone Company, W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Clarence R. Wolf and Harold Wolf, Partners, D/B/A Wolf Trucking ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Ray Smith Transport CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969