Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Security-Columbian Banknote Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 19, 1976No. 75-2273PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
The delicate and subtle problems involved in the labor law doctrine of employer successorship are again presented in this proceeding. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of an order resulting from its determination that SecurityColumbian Banknote Company (Security) is a successor employer of a company from which Security purchased printing plant assets. For the reasons stated hereinafter, we enforce the order only in part.
I
Like many successor stories, our saga must begin with the predecessor employer. Federated Banknote Company…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Labor Relations Board v. ArmatoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. Food Employers Council, Inc., and Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Labor Relations Board v. Security-Columbian Banknote CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976