Legal Opinion

Gifford v. City of Meriden

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 28, 2004No. File No. CV-03-0284196SPublished

1Opinion of the CourtWiese, J.

On July 1, 2004, the plaintiff, June Gifford, filed a four count amended complaint against the defendant, the city of Meriden.1 Through a motion filed September 21, 2004, the defendant has moved this court to strike count three of the amended complaint. Specifically, the defendant contends that count three fails to state a cause of action because the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is an evidentiary principle that cannot be maintained as an independent cause of action.

On September 27, 2004, the plaintiff filed a memorandum of law in opposition to the defendant’s motion. The court heard argument…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Malvicini v. Stratfield Motor Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Gilbert v. Middlesex HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API