Legal Opinion

Brant v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1989No. 45A03-8803-CR-69PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Philip Brant is appealing his conviction of theft, a Class D felony. IND. CODE § 35-48-4-2 (1985 Supp.) After a jury verdict, Brant was sentenced to a term of two years. Here, on appeal Brant raises several issues which can be restated as:(1) whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgment; and(2) whether Brant was denied a fair trial by the State's alleged failure to disclose a witness's criminal history.

The facts most favorable to the jury's verdict tend to establish that Brant was hired by Bruce Cooper to work as a car salesman at Cooper's B & K Auto Sales in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  2. McBroom v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. McGrawIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Busam v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Bridges v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Long v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Duren v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Long v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Hayworth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Say v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API