Duren v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant-Defendant, Justin R. Duren (Duren), appeals his conviction for theft, a Class D felony. Ind.Code § 35-43-4-1.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Duren raises four issues for our review, which we restate as follows:
1. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support his conviction for theft.
2. Whether he was improperly charged.
3. Whether the trial court properly instructed the jury.
4. Whether the trial court committed error in sentencing Duren.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In December, 1996, Duren met with Terry and Marsha Haire to discuss the installation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Edgecomb v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Hollowell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Gilliana v. PaniaguasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- McClendon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Long v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hightower v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Long v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Kibbey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. WhitneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.