Legal Opinion

Duren v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1999No. 87A01-9905-CR-170PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Defendant, Justin R. Duren (Duren), appeals his conviction for theft, a Class D felony. Ind.Code § 35-43-4-1.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Duren raises four issues for our review, which we restate as follows:

1. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support his conviction for theft.

2. Whether he was improperly charged.

3. Whether the trial court properly instructed the jury.

4. Whether the trial court committed error in sentencing Duren.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In December, 1996, Duren met with Terry and Marsha Haire to discuss the installation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Edgecomb v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hollowell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Gilliana v. PaniaguasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. McClendon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Ward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Long v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Hightower v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Long v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Kibbey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. WhitneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API