Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Federal Aviation Administration
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 8, 1999No. 98-1295PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners claim that respondent Federal Aviation Administration violated the Administrative Procedure Act by issuing a purported policy statement without notice and comment rulemaking and that the FAA’s issuance of a “type certificate” for the Boeing 777-300 pursuant to the newly adopted policy was an abuse of discretion. We conclude that notice and comment rulemaking was not required nor was the issuance of the type certificate illegal.
I
The administrator of the FAA is responsible for prescribing the minimum…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Better Government Association v. Department of State National Wildlife Federation v. United States Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Association of Flight Attendan v. Michael HuertaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Avia Dynamics, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Air Transport Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.