Dupart v. Roussell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JESSECA DUPART, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 20-1406 RODNEY ROUSSELL, ET AL. SECTION “R” (5) ORDER AND REASONS The Court ordered plaintiffs to show cause for why their Lanham Act claim should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim.1 Plaintiffs and pro se defendant, Rodney Roussell, filed memoranda in response.2 For the following reasons, the Court finds that plaintiffs Dupart and Harris fail to state a claim for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. The Court also finds that plaintiff Dupart states a claim for false…