Legal Opinion

Ernst v. Ganahl

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1913No. L.A. No. 3233PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Tanner, Taft & Odell, and Tanner, Odell, Odell & Taft, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff to recover two thousand dollars, alleged to be due him from defendant for services alleged to have been rendered by him in connection with an exchange of certain real properties by defendant and one C. C. Kohlmeier. The complaint alleged a written contract on the part of defendant, given on or about June 18, 1908, authorizing plaintiff to sell certain of his real property for one hundred and fifty thousand dollars, “or to exchange the same for other property which would be accepted by defendant,” and in which defendant agreed that if the property was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Brown v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ropes v. John Rosenfeld's SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Talla v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Reely v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API