Legal Opinion

Joyner v. Reynolds Bros. Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1927No. 17628PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. In this action upon a promissory note, in which the defendant pleaded partial failure of consideration by reason of an alleged “shortage” in the quantity of goods purchased, the testimony having conclusively established that the' defendant had reasonable opportunity to discover the deficiency, if existing, prior to the execution of the note sued on, it thus appears, as a matter of law, that any defense which might have been available as a result thereof was waived. Gamble v. Knott, 40 Ga. 199 (2); Moore v. Flowers Lumber Co., 35 Ga. App. 336 (133 S. E. 650).

2. Moreover, the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hindman v. RaperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  2. Gamble v. Knott & HollingsworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  3. Kiser Co. v. Mendel Department StoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Miller v. TimmermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  5. Moore v. Flowers Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ragsdale v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API