Legal Opinion

Seasongood & Mayer v. Riddle

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllread, J.

This is an action against Riddle and Woodhouse as individuals upon a check signed “London Chamber of Commerce, W. H. Riddle, by Robert Woodhouse, Secy.”

There is no averment that the agents in signing such check exceeded their authority. The averment is that the principal was a voluntary association, not incorporated. A demurrer to the amended petition was sustained. An amendment, stating that defendants were members of the London Chamber of Commerce and approved the issuing of the check, was rejected, upon the ground, that, if made, the petition would still be insufficient.

*89Final judgment was…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. James G. Smith & Associates, Inc. v. EverettOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. WorrellOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Re/Max Crossroads Properties v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. R. D. Johnson Milling Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. Scanlon v. DuffieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API