Legal Opinion

State v. Armbrust

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 1941No. 3385PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

The above-entitled cause is now being determined as an error proceeding by reason of defendant’s appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio.

On or about November 29, 1940, the defendant, Clarence Armbrust, was indicted by the grand jury of Franklin County, Ohio, of the crime of second degree murder. The action came on for trial m March, 1941, resulting in a verdict of guilty of manslaughter and not guilty of second degree murder.

Motion for new trial was duly filed, overruled and sentence imposed as authorized by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Calderon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BradyOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. State v. LafreniereOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. RodriguezOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. State v. McDanielOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. State v. Elwell, 06ca008923 (6-25-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API