Cluck v. State

The appellant in this case was convicted in a jury trial of possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-403(c)(5) (Supp. 2003). Appellant raises four issues for reversal of that conviction. He argues: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting testimony as to his previous methamphetamine-related convictions and his status as a parolee under Rule 404(b) of the Arkansas Rules of Evidence, and in finding that the probative value of this evidence was not outweighed by unfair prejudice under Ark. R. Evid. 403; (2) that the…