Legal Opinion

Safecover Roofing LLC v. Pro-Cover Roofing Inc. et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 11, 2026No. 3:20-cv-06212Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 SAFECOVER ROOFING LLC, CASE NO. 3:20-cv-06212-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION FOR 12 v. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS (DKT. NO. 25) 13 PRO-COVER ROOFING INC. et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees and costs. (Dkt. No. 25.) For the 17 reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. 18 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 19 In the interest of judicial economy, the Court assumes familiarity with the factual and 20 procedural background summarized in prior…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Ingram v. OroudjianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. United Steelworkers v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. McCown v. City of FontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Gates v. RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API