Legal Opinion

City of Hazard v. Eversole

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 10, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

This is the second appeal of this case. See 237 Ky. 242, 35 S. W. (2d) 313. On the first trial in the circuit court a judgment was entered in favor of the appellee against the appellant for the sum of $2,000, for the taking of his land for street purpose without first making just compensation for the property taken. WHien the case was before this court on the former appeal, no question as to the sufficiency of the petition to state a cause of action was made by the appellant. It is an established rule that where the sufficiency or insufficiency…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Hazard v. EversoleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Knecht v. Louisville Home Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  3. Begley v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Aud v. McAvoyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. FanninCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Crutchfield v. MansfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API