Legal Opinion

Henegar v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1962PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Peewitt

This appeal presents a question of law only and that is the plea of res ad judicata is good. This plea was sustained by the trial judge and this appeal resulted.

It appears that plaintiffs filed suit for damages against the defendant in the Circuit Court of Giles County on December 22, 1959, seeking damages to their livestock, personal property and real estate for the period of time from October 1, 1957, to October 1, 1959. Later the declaration was amended “so that the period of time covered by their suit shall be from October 1, 1957, to October 1, 1958.”

The damages complained of was being…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nashville v. ComarTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Harmon v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Johnston v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Phillips v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1952
  5. Graybar Electric Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National Cordova Corp. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chattanooga v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  3. AM. NAT. BANK & TRUST CO., ETC. v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Gordon R. McGee v. Carl PippinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  5. Kolpin v. Pioneer Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API