Legal Opinion
State v. DeVinney
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1965No. 1444PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRÚCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.
Appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Maricopa County of drawing a check on an insufficient account with the intent to defraud, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-316, as amended. This statute provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
“A. A person who, for himself dr for another, wilfully with intent to defraud, makes, draws, utters or. delivers to another person or persons a check or checks or draft or drafts on a bank or depositary for payment of money, knowing at the time of such making, drawing, uttering or delivery, that he or his principal does not have…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. DaymusArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Crowell v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Lewis v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. LoftisArizona Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Belknap, Inc. v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BerryArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. HughesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. VeresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.