Legal Opinion

State v. Alwinger

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 23, 2009No. 06C50666; A137479PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful sexual penetration in the first degree. ORS 163.411(l)(b). His sole assignment of error is that the trial court erred in imposing a mandatory minimum sentence of 300 months of incarceration. He argues that the sentence violates the proportionality guarantees of both the state and federal constitutions. We affirm.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Defendant lived with Brophy for a short period of time. Defendant sometimes babysat Brophy’s children and her three-year-old grandchild. One morning, after the grandchild had been playing in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Ewing v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. AlwingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Armas v. HighbergerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. DoughtyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API