Legal Opinion

State v. Huber

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 13, 2005No. 31086-4-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

119 P.3d 388 (2005)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Wayne Alan HUBER, Appellant.

No. 31086-4-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

September 13, 2005.

Brett Andrews Purtzer, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, for Appellant.

Steven Curtis Sherman, Attorney at Law, Allyn, WA, for Respondent.

MORGAN, J.

¶ 1 The sole issue in this prosecution for bail jump is whether the evidence is sufficient to show that the person on trial was the same person who earlier had failed to appear in court. Answering no, we reverse and remand with directions to dismiss.

¶ 2 In June 2003, the State charged Wayne Alan…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. BennWashington Supreme Court · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State v. GogginCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. State v. SappCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State Of Washington, V. Nicholas Windsor AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
  5. State v. SantosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API